Home > Civil Procedure > Changes to the Rules of Civil Procedure - Part 1
Changes to the Rules of Civil Procedure - Part 1
Posted on Wednesday, October 28, 2009 by Insurance Quotes Health
Substantial changes to the Rules of Civil Procedure come into effect January 1, 2010. This is part 1 of our review of the amendments.
A brand new rule has been created which introduces a “discovery plan”. This is a document created by the parties which will set out things such as the scope of discovery, timelines for service of Affidavits of Documents and names of persons to be examined. There is no prescribed form for the discovery plan, so precedents will have to be developed. This rule presumes a level of cooperation between counsel which may or may not exist. The aim of the rule is to make the process of documentary and oral discovery more streamlined and efficient; however, it could result in a new area of dispute between parties. It could be especially difficult in cases involving self-represented litigants to come to agreement on the elements of the discovery plan. If there is no discovery plan, a judge on a motion can refuse to grant the relief sought; for example, on an undertakings motion, the court could refuse to order the undertakings be complied with if there is no discovery plan. It would seem prudent to “paper the file” if counsel is unable to come to an agreement on the discovery plan, so that at least there is proof that an attempt at complying with the rule was made.
Although the discovery plan aims to make discovery more efficient, it is possible that it increases cost, at least in the short term, as counsel develop a standard practice for the discovery plan.
Category Article 2010 Rule Changes, Civil Procedure
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(189)
-
▼
October
(41)
- Snohomish County woman pays $69,000 in restitution...
- Insurance news, the Halloween edition
- National licensing group names OIC staffer "Regula...
- Tara Pollitt
- On average, how much do workers pay for health ins...
- Insurance news: Health insurance gift cards at the...
- Insurance news: New report about climate and chall...
- Changes to the Rules of Civil Procedure - Part 1
- White House report: Rural Americans face higher po...
- "Eleven Easy Ways to Destroy Your Company", and ot...
- WA insurance commissioner calls for legislation to...
- Insurance news: OR toughens rate reviews, and pars...
- Insurance news: MN governor calls on all governors...
- Making it real: The states' role in making federal...
- Insurance news: antitrust exemption vote, hurrican...
- OPCF 44: McGrath v. Arshad, [2008] O.J. No. 5771 (...
- Making health reform work at the local level
- Insurance news: toddler denied insurance for being...
- Insurance Commissioner warns companies not to use ...
- Five things never to say to your insurer
- Consumer Reports poll on health insurance
- Naches residents' worries turn from huge landslide...
- See how Washington compares on health coverage
- Renter's insurance advice for students and others
- And more insurance news: CA flood warning, NY auto...
- Insurance news: Insurers blast health reform, and ...
- Distracted Driving Legislation Comes into Effect O...
- Major health insurers doing the right thing on H1N...
- Good advice for open enrollment and choosing a hea...
- Insurance news: WA 16th in health care, new law co...
- Insurance news roundup
- WA insurance commissioner's office to lawmakers: P...
- Civil-rights groups launch health insurance reform...
- News re: Green River flood threat update
- Reading with your morning coffee...
- Ohio warns of check scam...
- What's the petition filed to liquidate Penn Treaty...
- Why not to throw water on a cooking oil fire...
- With large-value flood insurance scarce in the Gre...
- Update on flood insurance problems in Green River ...
- The uninsured in WA: excerpt from state House test...
-
▼
October
(41)