Home >Unlabelled > Car sharing and usage-based insurance bills move forward
Car sharing and usage-based insurance bills move forward
Posted on Tuesday, February 7, 2012 by Insurance Quotes Health
Everyone in Washington state is required to have basic liability insurance if you own a car. Well, here's two bills that could impact how you get insurance and how much you pay for coverage.
The first, House Bill 2384, creates an insurance framework for peer-to-peer car sharing programs. Several other western states (OR, CA) have passed similar bills. Here's how it would work: You sign-up with a program to share your car when you're not using it. Your financial liability for the car transfers to the program during the time it's in use. Of course you still need insurance coverage for when you're driving your car, but the program is responsible for having insurance coverage for any car in its use. The bill report has all of the details if you want to know more.
Next is an issue we've seen before: Usage-based insurance (House Bill 2361). Nothing prevents an insurance company from creating a usage-based insurance product today, but under our state law, all auto insurance products and why they cost what they do is public once the premiums are approved by our office.
Certain information is considered confidential (ie. those pesky credit scoring models) but only if they've been carved out in state law. This bill would allow insurers who want to offer a usage-base product the ability to keep their products confidential. Also, there would be limits on how the insurance company could use your information and they couldn't sell it to anyone.
So why should you care? Well, you could get your rates reduced depending on how you drive. This means: the amount of miles, where you drive, the time of the day you drive, your speed, etc. Of course it goes both ways - if you have a lead foot or tend to brake hard, you could see your rates go up. Here's the full details.
Both bills must pass a February 14 deadline to stay alive.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2012
(1096)
-
▼
February
(21)
- Landslides and mud-slides: NOT covered by a standa...
- Minimum Maintenance Standards Ruled Inapplicable
- Job opening: Actuary
- Insurance companies and agents fined
- A company that insured the Titanic goes under, lea...
- Tacoma man sentenced to prison for insurance fraud...
- Homeowners insurance: What's NOT covered
- Separating Self-Insurance Facts From Fiction
- Court of Appeal - Striking a Jury Notice
- Cease and desist order issued for "Prolong Plus" a...
- Most and least expensive cars to insure
- Give us your feedback
- Surpluses of nonprofit health insurers in WA at $2...
- How to look up the number of complaints against an...
- Loss Transfer - Costs of Assessments
- Survey: 57 percent of people in low-income familie...
- Car sharing and usage-based insurance bills move f...
- Job openings: Actuary, investigator, HR consultant...
- Insurers and agents fined more than $1.3 million i...
- Interpretation of the Insurance Contract – Back to...
- Basic Information on Life Insurance You Should Know
-
▼
February
(21)