Home > Civil Procedure > Changes to the Rules of Civil Procedure - Part 4
Changes to the Rules of Civil Procedure - Part 4
Posted on Wednesday, November 18, 2009 by Insurance Quotes Health
Substantial changes to the Rules of Civil Procedure come into effect January 1, 2010. This is part 4 of our review of the amendments.
A new rule has been introduced which limits the time for discovery to seven hours total, regardless of the number of parties to be examined. Parties may extend the time for discovery by consent, or if there is a dispute, a court may grant leave on a motion. There are both positives and negatives to this new rule. It may encourage counsel to be prepared for discovery and succinct in their questioning, and in many cases it is possible to complete discovery in only one day. There are some cases, however, where due to the number of parties or documents, or the complexity of the case it is not possible to complete discovery in only one day. The hope is that counsel will cooperate in such situations. Unfortunately there may be an increase in motions where disputes arise over this issue. I would not expect judges to look favourably upon having to adjudicate such procedural disputes and it may be that after a few initial decisions, counsel take a more practical approach.
Our previous post discussed r. 29.1, which requires parties to agree on a discovery plan. Where the length of discovery is likely to be an issue, it is a good idea to deal with this issue at that point to avoid later disagreements.
Category Article 2010 Rule Changes, Civil Procedure
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(189)
-
▼
November
(41)
- Insurance news: COBRA subsidy expiring for some, h...
- Insurance news: Hospital visit leads to Bankruptcy...
- Facebook in the News
- Free credit report - really?
- Fifty years of auto safety: 2009 Chevy Malibu vers...
- Insurance news: FDIC falls into the red, help for ...
- New women's health guidelines leave many questioni...
- Insurance news: the hazards of looking happy on Fa...
- Insurance-fraud charges against Tacoma couple
- Insurance news
- West Seattle man charged with 28 counts of theft i...
- New Washington projection: 1 million uninsured, $1...
- Unusual public tussle between Regence and Swedish ...
- Insurance news: Which cars are the least safe, a g...
- Changes to the Rules of Civil Procedure - Part 4
- Flood-related info: How much is it raining at the ...
- Need help with your health insurance?
- How much does uncompensated medical care cost ever...
- Insurance news: Local flood warning, more data re:...
- Changes to the Rules of Civil Procedure - Part 3
- Wind storm coming to parts of Western WA
- Kreidler makes the case to seniors for health care...
- Insurance news: Cell phone app tries to diagnose y...
- Supreme Court Dismisses Malicious Prosecution Acti...
- Howard Hanson dam flood maps: Lower flood risk, bu...
- And more insurance news: Misgivings among some Dem...
- Insurance news: Clinton argues that nation can't a...
- Insurance news: Mental health parity goes nationwi...
- How to stop a runaway car
- WSJ analysis: What the House Bill Would Mean for V...
- Insurance news: Progressive launches its pay-as-yo...
- Insurance Adjuster's Documents and Litigation Priv...
- Insurance news: Insurance jobs continue to decreas...
- Changes to the Rules of Civil Procedure - Part 2
- "Everything but marriage" law for domestic partner...
- Better flood prediction in the Green River Valley
- Insurance news: Avg car premium $1,655, back and f...
- Natural disaster insurance: Do you need it?
- Ontario Government Proposes New Auto Insurance Opt...
- Selling health insurance across state lines
- Sidewalk Non-Repair
-
▼
November
(41)