Home > Civil Procedure > Changes to the Rules of Civil Procedure - Part 3
Changes to the Rules of Civil Procedure - Part 3
Posted on Monday, November 16, 2009 by Insurance Quotes Health
Substantial changes to the Rules of Civil Procedure come into effect January 1, 2010. This is part 3 of our review of the amendments.
In our last post we discussed r. 29.2, which introduces a proportionality component into discovery. The rules have also been amended to change the test for disclosing documents. The current test is that parties are required to disclose all documents “relating to any matter in issue”. The case law has developed to define this test as anything having a “semblance of relevance” must be disclosed.
The amendment to r. 30 changes the wording: parties must now disclose documents “relevant to any matter in issue”. Until courts have weighed in on what exactly the change from “relating” to “relevant” means, there is some uncertainty. It seems that a relevance test is narrower than the “relating” test, but perhaps the aim is to merely codify the existing “semblance of relevance” test.
Category Article 2010 Rule Changes, Civil Procedure
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(189)
-
▼
November
(41)
- Insurance news: COBRA subsidy expiring for some, h...
- Insurance news: Hospital visit leads to Bankruptcy...
- Facebook in the News
- Free credit report - really?
- Fifty years of auto safety: 2009 Chevy Malibu vers...
- Insurance news: FDIC falls into the red, help for ...
- New women's health guidelines leave many questioni...
- Insurance news: the hazards of looking happy on Fa...
- Insurance-fraud charges against Tacoma couple
- Insurance news
- West Seattle man charged with 28 counts of theft i...
- New Washington projection: 1 million uninsured, $1...
- Unusual public tussle between Regence and Swedish ...
- Insurance news: Which cars are the least safe, a g...
- Changes to the Rules of Civil Procedure - Part 4
- Flood-related info: How much is it raining at the ...
- Need help with your health insurance?
- How much does uncompensated medical care cost ever...
- Insurance news: Local flood warning, more data re:...
- Changes to the Rules of Civil Procedure - Part 3
- Wind storm coming to parts of Western WA
- Kreidler makes the case to seniors for health care...
- Insurance news: Cell phone app tries to diagnose y...
- Supreme Court Dismisses Malicious Prosecution Acti...
- Howard Hanson dam flood maps: Lower flood risk, bu...
- And more insurance news: Misgivings among some Dem...
- Insurance news: Clinton argues that nation can't a...
- Insurance news: Mental health parity goes nationwi...
- How to stop a runaway car
- WSJ analysis: What the House Bill Would Mean for V...
- Insurance news: Progressive launches its pay-as-yo...
- Insurance Adjuster's Documents and Litigation Priv...
- Insurance news: Insurance jobs continue to decreas...
- Changes to the Rules of Civil Procedure - Part 2
- "Everything but marriage" law for domestic partner...
- Better flood prediction in the Green River Valley
- Insurance news: Avg car premium $1,655, back and f...
- Natural disaster insurance: Do you need it?
- Ontario Government Proposes New Auto Insurance Opt...
- Selling health insurance across state lines
- Sidewalk Non-Repair
-
▼
November
(41)