Home >Unlabelled > COBRA subsidy extended through March
COBRA subsidy extended through March
Posted on Thursday, March 4, 2010 by Insurance Quotes Health
In a 78-19 vote, Congress voted to extend the unemployment benefits late Tuesday night and the president signed it into law. This is good news for many laid-off workers who've also lost their health insurance. If you're laid-off before March 31, you may qualify for a 65 percent premium subsidy to help you pay for your former employer's health plan. Here's more:
Who's eligible for the new COBRA subsidy? People laid-off from their job between Sept. 1, 2008-March 31, 2010 and who worked for an employer with 20 or more employees qualify for the temporary subsidy. The individual's family also qualifies if they were covered by the employer's plan.
Individuals earning more than $125,000 per year and married couples with annual incomes over $290,000 are not eligible for the subsidy.
Also, If an employer goes out of business or stops offering health insurance its employees are no longer eligible for COBRA or the subsidy.
How much is the subsidy and how do people enroll? People who qualify for the subsidy pay 35 percent of the total premium. The U.S. Government will reimburse the employer or insurer for the remaining 65 percent of the premium. Employers must notify former employees if they qualify for the COBRA subsidy.
How long does the subsidy last? The subsidy is good for 9 months.
What if I lost my job, but didn't select COBRA before? Can I still apply for the subsidy? Yes, employers must notify former employees who qualify for the subsidy and employees have 60 days to decide.
Where can I learn more about COBRA and the subsidy? Visit the U.S. Dept. of Labor's Employee Benefits Security Administration page FAQs For Employees About COBRA Continuation Health Coverage or call 1-866-444-3272. Or visit our special COBRA page
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(296)
-
▼
March
(31)
- Amendments to the Municipal Minimum Maintenance St...
- Insurance in WA: Statistics: Taxes paid, premiums,...
- Health care reform: Where to find a good summary (...
- Climate change survey surprise: insurance regulato...
- Washington flood market assistance plan: Details, ...
- Kreidler launches program to help Green River Vall...
- Federal flood insurance program lapses as Congress...
- Court to use a contextual approach in deciding whe...
- TN officials seize offices of alleged multi-state ...
- Kreidler re: health insurance mandate: "I think pe...
- Recession fuels health insurance scams
- Statement re: lawsuit over health care reform legi...
- Graham v. Toronto, [2009] O.J. No. 4633
- What the federal health reform legislation means f...
- In a down economy, be wary of health insurance scams
- Which are the most expensive (or the cheapest) car...
- Insurance news, including Slate's "whipometer"...
- Court rejects argument deductible does not apply t...
- Insurance news: Gunshot wounds and insurance, frau...
- Insurance news: lawsuit filed against annuity brok...
- West Seattle man sentenced in insurance fraud case
- SCC: good review on law of negligence
- Us, by the numbers...
- Insurance news: Howard Hanson dam starting to fill...
- New SABS Regulations Available
- COBRA subsidy extended through March
- How healthy is your county?
- WA state lawmakers approve flood insurance legisla...
- Vast difference between Haiti and Chile earthquake...
- If things look different...
- Insurance news: Nat.'l flood program closes, rate ...
-
▼
March
(31)